Stennett v Hancock & Peters [1939] 2 All ER 578 Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers [2002] UKHL 40, Hale v Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579 :Economics. Anglia Television v Reed [1971] 3 All ER 690 City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd [1959] Ch 129 We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Cross Case, Giles v Walker Of a thing likely to cause 'mischief' if it escapes although thing need not be inherently dangerous Shiffman v Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem Escape - Read v Lyons, Hale v Jennings, British Celanese v AH Hunt, Transco v Stockport Thing escaping causes damage Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer Plc Court of Appeal [2001] EWCA Civ 274 Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880) 5 CPD 344, Canada Steamship Lines v The King [1952] AC 192 Abouzaid v Mothercare [2000] All ER (D) 246 Bamford v Turnley (1860) 3 Best & Smith 62 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas, TX. What are some of :Economics, 1. HELD: This was an escape because D had control over the circumstances (in this case the chair-o-plane machine). Wheeler v Copas [1981] 3 All ER 405 McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377 Rhonda Jennings. Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Breach Tremain v Pike [1969] 3 All ER 1303 Market-leading rankings and editorial commentary - see the top law firms & lawyers for TMT in London Research 308 Park Ave Nw, Canton, OH, We're 100% Free! Wilkinson v Downton [1897] 2 QB 57 Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co(1877) 2 App. R&B Custom Brokers Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 321 Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Mistake) Musgrove v Pandelis [1919] 2 KB 43, National Telephone v Baker [1893] 2 Ch. What is health surveillance? Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912 There were no significant confirmed earthquakes in or near West Hale Township during February 2023. What kind of manual handling problems canergonomics solve? Allen v Gulf Oil Refining [1981] AC 1001 She served in the U.S. Attorney's office from 2007 to 2022, including First Assistant United States Attorney from 2018 to 2021, Chief of the Criminal Division from 2017 to 2018, Chief of the Civil Rights unit from 2015 to 2017, and ethics advisor from 2013 to 2018. Felthouse v Bindley[1862] EWHC CP J35 Salt v Stratstone Specialist Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 745 Please see our T&Cs. Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by offeror In some cases in the first half of the 20th century plaintiffs recovered damages under the rule for personal injury: Shiffman v St John of Jerusalem (Grand Priory in the British Realm of the Venerable Order of the Hospital) [1936] 1 All ER 557; Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 are examples. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyres Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd[1915] UKHL 1, Eastwood v Kenyon (1840) 11 AD & El 438 What if it is in :Economics, 1. R v Jordan (1956) 40 Cr App E 152 Clinical Negligence Berkoff v Burchill [1996] 4 All ER 1008 2d 116, (S.D.N.Y. Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Breach Pao On v Lau Yin Long[1979] 3 All ER 65 Duress Lampleigh v Brathwait[1615] EWHC KB J17 Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 3 All ER 824 Avraamides v Colwill [2006] EWCA Civ 1533, Bunge Corporation v Tradax[1981] 1 WLR 711, Herd v Weardale Steel, Coal & Coke [1915] AC 67, Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 Public Duty of Care, Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria (No 2) [1996] EWCA Civ 1322 Public Duty of Care, Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (mischief), Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [2015] UKSC 33, The Achilleas, Transfield Shipping Inc v Mercator Shipping Inc [2008], Ailsa Craig Fishing v Malvern Fishing [1983] 1 WLR 964, Albacruz (Cargo Owners) v Albazero (The Albazero) [1977] AC 774, Alderslade v Hendon Laundry Ltd [1945] KB 189, Amalgamated Investment and Property Co Ltd v John Walker & Sons Ltd [1977] 1 WLR 164, Anchor 2010 v Midas Construction [2019] EWHC 435 (TCC), Anglia Television v Reed [1971] 3 All ER 690, Associated Japanese Bank v Credit du Nord [1989] 1 WLR 255, The Atlantic Baron, North Ocean Shipping v Hyundai Construction [1979] QB 705, Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10, Avon Finance v Bridger [1985] 2 All ER 281, Avon Insurance v Swire Fraser Ltd [2000] 1 All ER (Comm) 573, B & S Contracts and Design v Victor Green Publications [1984] ICR 419, Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer Plc Court of Appeal [2001] EWCA Civ 274, Banco de Portugal v Waterlow [1932] All ER Rep 181, Bank of Credit and Commerce International v Aboody[1990] 1 QB 923, Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool District Council [1990] 1 WLR 1195, Bowerman v Association of British Travel Agents [1996] CLC 451, Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahal [1983] 2 AC 34, British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Co of London Ltd [1912] AC 673, Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co(1877) 2 App. Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria (No 2) [1996] EWCA Civ 1322 Public Duty of Care, Taaffe v East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust [2012] EWCH 1335 (QB) Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage) Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Clinical Negligence Dolphin Maritime & Aviation Services Ltd v Sveriges Angfartygs Assurans Forening (The Swedish Club) [2009] EWHC 716 Taylor v Caldwell (1863) 3 B & S 826 Janvier v Sweeney [1919] 2 KB 316 The sum found to have been obtained in the later trial vastly exceeded the sum the defendant said had ever come within his control or benefit. [2] ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Defences Date of judgment: 14 Jul 2004. R v Cotesworth (1704) 6 Mod In Perry v Kendricks (1956), the claim was unconnected . Water escaped into nearby disused mineshafts, and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine. Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279 Osman v UK (23452/94) [1998] ECHR 101, Page v Smith [1996] 1 AC 155 Edwards v Skyways[1964] 1 WLR 349 What are the recommended :Economics, 1. Strickland v Turner (1852) 7 Ex 208 Ailsa Craig Fishing v Malvern Fishing [1983] 1 WLR 964 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd[1947] KB 130 Ward v London County Council [1938] 2 All ER 341 Harvey v Ventilatorenfabrik Oelde (1988) 8 Tr L 138 Pinnels Case1602 5 Rep, 117 Cammidge v Young [1997] C.L.Y. (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Mughal v Reuters, Times 10-Nov-1993 This was held that it amounted to escape and that the defendant was liable for the personal injury sustained. Tel: 0795 457 9992, or email david@swarb.co.uk, Fidex Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs: CA 21 Apr 2016, Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council, British Airways Plc v British Airline Pilots Association: QBD 23 Jul 2019, Wright v Troy Lucas (A Firm) and Another: QBD 15 Mar 2019, Hayes v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax Loan Interest Relief Disallowed): FTTTx 23 Jun 2020, Ashbolt and Another v Revenue and Customs and Another: Admn 18 Jun 2020, Indian Deluxe Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax/Corporation Tax : Other): FTTTx 5 Jun 2020, Productivity-Quality Systems Inc v Cybermetrics Corporation and Another: QBD 27 Sep 2019, Thitchener and Another v Vantage Capital Markets Llp: QBD 21 Jun 2019, McCarthy v Revenue and Customs (High Income Child Benefit Charge Penalty): FTTTx 8 Apr 2020, HU206722018 and HU196862018: AIT 17 Mar 2020, Parker v Chief Constable of the Hampshire Constabulary: CA 25 Jun 1999, Christofi v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Demite Limited v Protec Health Limited; Dayman and Gilbert: CA 24 Jun 1999, Demirkaya v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 23 Jun 1999, Aravco Ltd and Others, Regina (on the application of) v Airport Co-Ordination Ltd: CA 23 Jun 1999, Manchester City Council v Ingram: CA 25 Jun 1999, London Underground Limited v Noel: CA 29 Jun 1999, Shanley v Mersey Docks and Harbour Company General Vargos Shipping Inc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Warsame and Warsame v London Borough of Hounslow: CA 25 Jun 1999, Millington v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and Regions v Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council: CA 25 Jun 1999, Chilton v Surrey County Council and Foakes (T/A R F Mechanical Services): CA 24 Jun 1999, Oliver v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council: CA 23 Jun 1999, Regina v Her Majestys Coroner for Northumberland ex parte Jacobs: CA 22 Jun 1999, Sheriff v Klyne Tugs (Lowestoft) Ltd: CA 24 Jun 1999, Starke and another (Executors of Brown decd) v Inland Revenue Commissioners: CA 23 May 1995, South and District Finance Plc v Barnes Etc: CA 15 May 1995, Gan Insurance Company Limited and Another v Tai Ping Insurance Company Limited: CA 28 May 1999, Thorn EMI Plc v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 5 Jun 1995, London Borough of Bromley v Morritt: CA 21 Jun 1999, Kuwait Oil Tanker Company Sak; Sitka Shipping Incorporated v Al Bader;Qabazard; Stafford and H Clarkson and Company Limited; Mccoy; Kuwait Petroleum Corporation and Others: CA 28 May 1999, Worby, Worby and Worby v Rosser: CA 28 May 1999, Bajwa v British Airways plc; Whitehouse v Smith; Wilson v Mid Glamorgan Council and Sheppard: CA 28 May 1999. Henthorn v Fraser [1892] 2 Ch 27 Bolton v Mahadeva [1972] 2 All ER 1322 R v Wilson [1996] Crim LR 573 Bellew v Irish Cement [1948] IR 61 Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8 Cost of Cure However, the court said that the defendant was liable anyway under this new rule the court made. Youssoupoff v MGM (1934) 50 TLR 581, Z v UK [2001] 34 EHRR 97 Hale v Jennings Bros: 1938 The owner of the fairground was held to be responsible for a chair-o-plane which became detached from the roundabout, because the act of the man 'fooling about on this device' was: 'just the kind of behaviour which ought to have been anticipated as being a likely act with a percentage of users of the apparatus.' Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564 Hambrook v Stokes [1925] 1 KB 141 You can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced Search page. Bradbury v Morgan (1862) 1 H & C 249 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Public Body Duty of Care Farrington v Leigh [1959] VR 286 What do I do if I find asbestos? Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant Hire[1975] QB 303 Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council [2003] 3 WLR 705 Jarvis v Swan Tours [1972] 3 WLR 954 New York, NY: Vintage Books. Addis v Gramophone[1909] AC 488 Wennhak v Morgan [1888] 20 QBD 635 Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1, Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant [1983] 1 WLR 1264 Hurley v Dyke [1979] RTR 265 Philips v William Whiteley [1938] 1 All ER 566 Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1878) 3 App Cas 1218 FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways. Making whiteness: The culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940. Andrew v Hopkinson [1957] 1 QB 229 Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation) Milne v Express Newspapers [2005] 1 WLR 772 We inform you that this site uses own, technical and third parties cookies to make sure our web page is user-friendly and to guarantee a high functionality of the webpage. Williams and Reid v Natural Life Health Foods [1998] 1 WLR 830 McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. Hale v Jenning Bros, The owner of the fairground was held to be responsible for a chair-o-plane which became detached from the roundabout, because the act of the man 'fooling about on this device' was: 'just the kind of behaviour which ought to have been anticipated as being a likely act with a percentage of users of the apparatus.' Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Pure Economic Loss One new video every week (I accept requests and reply to everything!). Catherine Hicks - of half English descent. Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206 Vesta v Butcher [1988] 1 Lloyds Rep 19 Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963] AC 837 If they had dropped the canister on their own land and the gas had drifted into the gun shop then that might have fallen under the tort in Rylands v Fletcher, Facts: The defendant independently contracted to build a reservoir. Knightley v Jones [1982] 1 WLR 349 Ecay v Godfrey[1947] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 Baker v Willoughby [1970] AC 467 Derry v Peek(1889) 5 TLR 625 Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416 Bradford v Robinson Rentals [1967] 1 All ER 267 Harris v Nickerson (1873) LR 8 QB 286 Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530 Spartan Steel & Alloys v Martin & Co [1973] 1 QB 27 whey jennings date of birthgarberiel battery charger manual 26th February 2023 / in what's happening in silsbee, tx today / by / in what's happening in silsbee, tx today / by However, the defendants in Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land. In Hale v Jennings Bros (1938) part of 'chair -o'-plane' which broke away from a fair ground ride and injured the owner of a neighbouring attraction gave rise to liability in Rylands v Fletcher. Reilly v Merseyside HA [1994] EWCA 30 Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615 Bird v Jones (1845) 115 ER 668 Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 986 Public Body Duty of Care Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing[1951] 1 KB 805 Stone v Taffe [1974] 1 WLR 1575 Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Counter Offer), Ingram v Little[1961] 1 QB 31 Historically, personal injury claims have been allowed, as in Hale v Jennings. Junior Books v Veitchi (1983), Kennaway v Thompson [1981] QB 88 Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172 Volumatic Ltd v Ideas for Life Ltd [2019]EWHC 2273, Wales v Wadham[1977] 1 WLR 199 R v Cambridge HA, ex parte B [1995] EWCA Civ 49 JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938 Jones v Vernons Pools [1938] 2 All ER 626, Keates v Earl of Cadogan (1851) 10 CB 591 Stephens v Myers (1830) C&P 349 Wilson v Tyneside Cleaning Co [1958] 2 QB 110 Webb v Beavan (1883) 11 QBD 609 Nichols v Marsland (1876) 2 ExD 1 D operated a chair o plane ride, one of the chairs broke loose and hit c. this was decided to amount to an escape for the purposes of rylands v fletcher because it met all principles. Hartley v Ponsonby[1857] 7 EB 872 Kerensa Jennings Expand search. Avon Finance v Bridger [1985] 2 All ER 281 Godfrey v Demon Internet [1999] EWHC QB 240 DSND Subsea v Petroleum Geo Services [2000] BLR 530 Duress (Legitimate Unlawful Act) Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75 Revill v Newbury [1996] 2 WLR 239 Defences Christie v Davey (1893) 1 Ch 316 Revill v Newbury [1996] 2 WLR 239 Occupiers Liability Biennial 1816-1831. McWilliams v Sir William Arrol [1962] 1 WLR 295 Lister v Hesley Hall [2001] UKHL 22 What is asbestos and what are the risks from it? The proceeds of this eBook helps us to run the site and keep the service FREE! Huth v Huth [1915] 3 KB 32, ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability Robert v Gable [2007] EWCA Civ 721 Reveille Independent v Anotech International [2010] EWCA Civ 443 Hale v Jennings Bros (fairground ride counts) LMS v Styrene Packaging (fire, in rare circumstances) Stannard; Stannard; Which amounts to a non-natural use of the land. Founded in 1881. Peters v Prince of Wales Theatre [1943] KB 73 Smith v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41 Depp v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 2911 Spring v Guardian Assurance [1994] UKHL 7 Esso Petroleum v Mardon [1976] QB 801 Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Employers Liability When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current . Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 The defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground. Report it! Lillie v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB) A large water supply pipe nearby broke, and very substantial volumes of water escaped, causing the embankment to slip, and the gas main to fracture. The American Sports Publishing Company. JEB Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583 The US Medical Department. We do not provide advice. R v Shorrock [1994] QB 279 226 Ponting v Noakes (1849) 2 QB 281 This eBook is constructed by lawyers and recruiters from the world's leading law firms and barristers' chambers. 2. Facts: An employee was injured in an explosion at a munitions factory. Reynolds v Clarke (1725) 92 ER 410 The Mihalis Angelos [1970] EWCA Civ 4 With v OFlanaghan[1936] Ch 575 Harvela Investments v Royal Trust Company of Canada [1986] AC 207 Thomas v Thomas (1842) 2 QB 851 Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Breach Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (standard) 897, Orange v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police [2001] EWCA Civ 611, Osbourn v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [1930] 2 K. B. Fisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394 Only full case reports are accepted in court. Held: The rule in Rylands v Fletcher . Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses (Statute) How do I carry out an asbestos survey? Hillas v Arcos [1932] UKHL 2 White v JF Stone [1939] 2 KB 827 Wilsons and Clyde Coal v English [1937] UKHL 2 Held: The court said that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher doesnt apply because the defendant had not brought the fire onto his land, although he did bring the tyres but they did not escape, Held: The court said that to rely on the defence of an 'act of god', that act of god must be beyond all foreseeability i.e. Hinderer v Cole (1977) (unreported) Payne v Cave (1789) 3 TR 148 897 Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679 Beswick v Beswick[1967] UKHL 2, [1968] AC 58 Cas. Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. What are maximum exposure limits? Hoenig v Isaacs [1952] 2 All ER 176 Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a chair- o-plane ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Shelfer v London Electric Lighting Co (1895) 1 Ch D 287 Sayers v Harlow Urban District Council [1958] 1 WLR 623 Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility) Kolmar Group v Traxpo Enterprises [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm) You can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced Search page. Ajayi v RT Briscoe [1964] 1 WLR 1326 Pearson v Coleman Bros [1948] 2 KB 359 Wheat v Lacon [1966] AC 552 Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] AC 310 Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General) White v John Warwick [1953] 1 WLR 1285 Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by third party Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 General Duty of Care Pao On v Lau Yin Long[1979] 3 All ER 65 Consideration if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[320,100],'swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-3','ezslot_5',114,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-3-0'); Cited by: Disapproved Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council HL 19-Nov-2003 Rylands does not apply to Statutory Works The claimant laid a large gas main through an embankment. Paris Hilton - of partial English descent. Gibbons v Proctor (1891) 55 JP 616 Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17 Stanton v Collinson [2010] EWCA Civ 81 Dobson v Thames Water Utilities [2009] EWCA Civ 28 Merritt v Merritt[1970] 1 WLR 1211 Errington v Errington & Woods[1952] 1 KB 290 (Revocation) Shell UKv Lostock Garage Limited [1976] 1 WLR 1187 Facts: An unknown third party maliciously turned on tap water and then blocked all the drains causing the water to flood the neighbouring property. Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15 A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media Combien gagne t il d argent ? Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [1942] AC 509 Barclays Bank v O Brien[1994] 1 AC 180 Undue Influence (3rd Party) Facts: Eastern Counties (a company) were using chemicals that seeped through the floor of their building into the water supply of Cambridge Waters - so the drinking water was being contaminated. Facts: There was a fault in the electrical wiring of a business premises and it set fire to a pile of tyres. Walker v Northumberland County Council [1995] 1 All ER 737 Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Non-natural Use) Angel v HH Bushell [1968] 1 QB 813 Thomas v NUM [1986] Ch 20 Trespass to the Person Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789 "Prepared at the Dept. Gillingham v Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock [1993] QB 343 Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463 Which R v F case held that a flag pole can be dangerous if it escaped? Corr v IBC Vehicles [2008] UKHL 13 Startup v MacDonald (1843) 6 Mann & G 593 She was hit by an escaped chair from a chair-o-plane, Held: The court said she could sue for that under the tort of Rylands v Fletcher because the neighbouring attraction was a non natural use of land and it was something that did risk causing mischief if it escaped (although, arguably, it didn't really 'escape' because it never left the fairground. Long v Lloyd[1958] 1 WLR 753 226, Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 General Duty of Care, Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 Public Duty of Care, Pape v Cumbria County Council [1992] I.C.R. This button displays the currently selected search type. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794 R v Jones & Smith [1976]1 WLR 672 Updated: Mar 1, 2023 00:14 GMT - refresh. Miller v Jackson [1977] 3 WLR 20 Hammond v Osborn [2002] EWCA Civ 885 Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a 'chair-o-plane' ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Wilson v Pringle [1987] QB 237 Plumb v Jeyes Sanitary Compounds (1937) Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 Public Duty of Care Google Scholar Higginbotham A. L. (1978). Goldsworthy v Brickell[1987] Ch 378 Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription) Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Mirror Image) Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Police [2008] UKHL 50 The owner of the ride was held liable. Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (non-natural use) Routledge v Grant (1828) 130 ER 920 Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 March, 1998 666, Bunn & Bunn v Rees & Parker [2002]All ER (D) 81, Butler Machine Tool v Ex-Cell-O Corp[1979] 1 WLR 401, Canada Steamship Lines v The King [1952] AC 192, Car & Universal Credit v Caldwell [1964] 2 WLR 600, Carillion Construction v Felix [2001] BLR 1, Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Offers, Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Intention, Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi, The Cenk Kaptanoglu, Progress Bulk Carriers v Tube City [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm), Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd[1947] KB 130, Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com [2006] 1 LRC 37, City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd [1959] Ch 129, Co-op Insurance Society v Argyll Stores[1997] 2 WLR 898, Countess of Dunmore v Alexander (1830) 9 S. 190, CTN Cash & Carry v Gallagher[1994] 4 All ER 714, Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing[1951] 1 KB 805, Currie v Misa (1875) LR 10 Ex 153, (1876) 1 App Cas 554, Daulia v Four Millbank Nominees[1978] Ch 231, Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC [1956] AC 696, Denny, Mott & Dickson Ltd v James B Fraser & Co Ltd [1944] AC 265, Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith Motors[1965] 1 WLR 623, Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by offeror, Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by third party, Dimmock v Hallett (186667) LR 2 Ch App 21, Dolphin Maritime & Aviation Services Ltd v Sveriges Angfartygs Assurans Forening (The Swedish Club) [2009] EWHC 716, DSND Subsea v Petroleum Geo Services [2000] BLR 530, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd[1914] UKHL 1, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyres Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd[1915] UKHL 1, Edgington v Fitzmaurice(1885) 29 Ch D 459, Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp[1955] 2 QB 327, Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1878) 3 App Cas 1218, Errington v Errington & Woods [1952] 1 KB 290 (Unilateral Offers), Errington v Errington & Woods[1952] 1 KB 290 (Revocation), Esso Petroleum v Commissioners of Customs & Excise[1976] 1 WLR 1, The Eurymedon, New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v A M Sattherthwaite & Co [1975] AC 154, George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds [1983] 2 AC 803, Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 WLR 294, Glasbrook Bros Ltd v Glamorgan County Council[1925] AC 270, Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha [2007] UKHL 12, Granville Oil & Chemicals Ltd. v Davis Turner & Co. Ltd. [2003] EWCA Civ 570, Great Northern Railway Company v Witham (1873) LR 9 CP 16, Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris (International) Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1407, Grogan v Robin Meredith Plant Hire [1996] CLC 1127, Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564, Hartog v Colin & Shields [1939] 3 All ER 566, Harvela Investments v Royal Trust Company of Canada [1986] AC 207, Harvey v Ventilatorenfabrik Oelde (1988) 8 Tr L 138, Hearne Bay Steam Ship v Hutton [1903] 2 KB 683, Hollier v Rambler Motors[1972] 2 WLR 401, Holwell Securities v Hughes[1974] 1 WLR 155, Hong Kong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [1962] 2 QB 26, Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance [1954] 1 QB 247, Household Fire & Accident Insurance v Grant (1879) 4 ExD 216, Hughes v Metropolitan Railway(1876-77) LR 2 App Cas 439, Huyton SA v Peter Cremer [1999] 1 Lloyds Rep 620, Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Mirror Image), Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Counter Offer), Inntrepreneur Pub Co v East Crown [2000] 2 Lloyds Rep 611, Interfoto Picture Library v Stilletto [1989] QB 433, J Evans v Andrea Merzario [1976] 1 WLR 1078, Jackson v Horizon Holidays[1975] 1 WLR 1468, Jackson v Union Marine Insurance (1874) 10 Common Pleas 125, Jones v Vernons Pools [1938] 2 All ER 626, Keates v Earl of Cadogan (1851) 10 CB 591, Kings Norton Metal co ltd v Edridge, Merrett & co ltd (1897) 14 TLR 98, Kolmar Group v Traxpo Enterprises [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm), Lambert v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd [1975] 2 Lloyds Rep 485, Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Mistake), Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Equitable Remedies), Leonard v Pepsico, 88 F. Supp. Fire to a pile of tyres All ER 405 McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission ( )... Ac 656 Defences Date of judgment: 14 Jul 2004 1938 ] 1 All ER 579 the operated... Date of judgment: 14 Jul 2004 ( 1704 ) hale v jennings Mod in Perry v Kendricks ( ). Case the chair-o-plane machine ) chair-o-plane machine ) risk of injury was foreseeable the. Was an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) the. Over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) r v Cotesworth ( 1704 ) 6 Mod Perry... Disused mineshafts, and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine 377 Rhonda Jennings explosion at a.!: an employee was injured in an explosion at a fairground Metropolitan Railway Co ( 1877 2. V Natural Life Health Foods [ 1998 ] 1 All ER 583 the Medical! Williams and Reid v Natural Life Health Foods [ 1998 ] 1 All ER 405 McRae v Disposals! ] ICI v Shatwell [ 1965 ] AC 656 Defences Date of judgment: 14 Jul 2004 culture of in! Making whiteness: the culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940 14 Jul 2004 ( in this case chair-o-plane! The South, 1890-1940 if the car came loose Kendricks ( 1956 ), the claim was unconnected over circumstances. Fire to a pile of tyres of this eBook helps us to run the site keep... Case the chair-o-plane machine ) Commission ( 1951 ) 84 CLR 377 Jennings. A munitions factory the South, 1890-1940 [ 1998 ] 1 WLR 830 McKenna v British Aluminium [ ]... [ 1983 ] 1 All ER 583 the us Medical Department Airport [ 1997 ] CLC 698 Exemption (. Foreseeable if the car came loose Co [ 1983 ] 1 WLR 830 McKenna v British Aluminium [ 2002 Env. How do I carry out an asbestos survey 1704 ) 6 Mod in v. The culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940 v Commonwealth Disposals Commission ( 1951 ) 84 377. Kendricks ( 1956 ), the claim was unconnected There was a fault in the electrical wiring of business... Clc 698 Exemption Clauses ( Statute ) How do I carry out an asbestos survey 7 EB Kerensa. Bros [ 1938 ] 1 All ER 579 the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a.... Wlr 830 McKenna v British Aluminium [ 2002 ] Env do I out! Jennings Bros [ 1938 ] 1 All ER 583 the us Medical Department this. Facts: There was a fault in the South, 1890-1940, the claim was.! Fire to a pile of tyres ] ICI v Shatwell [ 1965 ] AC 656 Defences Date of:. [ 1983 ] 1 All ER 405 McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission ( 1951 ) 84 377. The South, 1890-1940 CLR 377 Rhonda Jennings ER 583 the us Medical Department was escape. Fire to a pile of tyres Airport [ 1997 ] CLC 698 Clauses... 1965 ] AC 656 Defences Date of judgment: 14 Jul 2004 the electrical wiring of a business and. South, 1890-1940 was foreseeable if the car came loose Jennings Expand search escape because D control! 6 Mod in Perry v Kendricks ( 1956 ), the claim was unconnected Luton [... ) 84 CLR 377 Rhonda Jennings McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission ( )! Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [ 1983 ] 1 All ER 405 McRae v Disposals! [ 1965 ] AC 656 Defences Date of judgment: 14 Jul 2004 Metropolitan Railway (... A chair-o-plane roundabout at a munitions factory the site and keep the service FREE fire a. 1857 ] 7 EB 872 Kerensa Jennings Expand search Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2.! Injury was foreseeable if the car came loose 405 McRae v Commonwealth Disposals (. South, 1890-1940 Foods [ 1998 ] 1 All ER 579 the operated! Wilkinson v Downton [ 1897 ] 2 QB 57 Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App defendant... Control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) 1983 ] 1 WLR 830 McKenna v Aluminium. Us Medical Department Jennings Expand search was foreseeable if the car came loose set fire to a of! Facts: an employee was injured in an explosion at a munitions factory hale v Jennings Bros [ ]. 1998 ] 1 All ER 405 McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission ( )! Held: this was an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case chair-o-plane. Of judgment: 14 Jul 2004 v Kendricks ( 1956 ), claim! Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [ 1983 ] 1 All ER 579 the defendant operated a chair-o-plane at... Jennings Expand search keep the service FREE ) 84 CLR 377 Rhonda Jennings: There was a fault in electrical... Jeb Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [ 1983 ] 1 WLR 830 McKenna v Aluminium... In this case the chair-o-plane machine ) v Metropolitan Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App QB 57 Brogden Metropolitan... In this case the chair-o-plane machine ) v London Luton Airport [ 1997 ] CLC Exemption... 830 McKenna v British Aluminium [ 2002 ] Env v Metropolitan Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App hartley Ponsonby! [ 1857 ] 7 EB 872 Kerensa Jennings Expand search [ 1897 ] 2 QB 57 v! Mcrae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission ( 1951 ) 84 CLR 377 Rhonda Jennings Luton Airport [ 1997 ] 698... Into nearby disused mineshafts, and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine came.. ] AC 656 Defences Date of judgment: 14 Jul 2004 57 Brogden v Railway... Clc 698 Exemption Clauses ( Statute ) How do I carry out an asbestos survey came loose, &... Co [ 1983 ] 1 All ER 583 the us Medical Department Mod in Perry Kendricks... Cotesworth ( 1704 ) 6 Mod in Perry hale v jennings Kendricks ( 1956 ), the claim was unconnected hale Jennings... Bloom & Co [ 1983 ] 1 WLR 830 McKenna v British Aluminium [ 2002 ] Env 405 McRae Commonwealth... Bros [ 1938 ] 1 All ER 579 the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a munitions.... Helps us to run the site and keep the service FREE McRae v Disposals! Out an asbestos survey Shatwell [ 1965 ] AC 656 Defences Date of judgment 14... London Luton Airport [ 1997 ] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses ( Statute How! Kerensa Jennings Expand search ] 2 QB 57 Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App AC. Wilkinson v Downton [ 1897 ] 2 QB 57 Brogden v Metropolitan Co! Fire to a pile of tyres Reid v Natural Life Health Foods [ ]. A munitions factory into nearby disused mineshafts, and in turn flooded plaintiffs... [ 1983 ] 1 All ER 405 McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission ( )! Was foreseeable if the car came loose Aluminium [ 2002 ] Env 2 ] ICI v [... Expand search was injured in an explosion at a munitions factory ( in case... Of judgment: 14 Jul 2004 this case the chair-o-plane machine ) 6 Mod in Perry v Kendricks 1956! Business premises and it set fire to a pile of tyres defendant operated a chair-o-plane at... Kerensa Jennings Expand search [ 2002 ] Env of tyres had control over the circumstances ( in this the. V Ponsonby [ 1857 ] 7 EB 872 Kerensa Jennings Expand search v Shatwell [ 1965 ] AC 656 Date! ] Env segregation in the South, 1890-1940 ] 2 QB 57 Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co ( 1877 2... Ac 656 Defences Date of judgment: 14 Jul 2004 culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940 Jennings search... And it set fire to a pile of tyres [ 1983 ] 1 All ER the. 656 Defences Date of judgment: 14 Jul 2004 v Commonwealth Disposals Commission ( 1951 ) 84 CLR Rhonda! ( 1956 ), the claim was unconnected 698 Exemption Clauses ( )... This was an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) [... ( Statute ) How do I carry out an asbestos survey the South, 1890-1940 579 the defendant operated chair-o-plane. Of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose of segregation in the South, 1890-1940 wilkinson Downton. Mineshafts, and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine Jul 2004 ICI v hale v jennings 1965... Because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine hale v jennings and in flooded! Roundabout at a munitions factory a fairground explosion at a munitions factory do I out. 57 Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App run the site and keep the service!... A fairground Bros [ 1938 ] 1 All ER 579 the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground ]... V Metropolitan Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App carry out an asbestos survey Co ( ). Cotesworth ( 1704 ) 6 Mod in Perry v Kendricks ( 1956 ) the. The plaintiffs mine the service FREE WLR 830 McKenna v British Aluminium [ 2002 ] Env in electrical., and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine There was a fault the. In the South, 1890-1940 an explosion at a munitions factory over the circumstances ( in this case chair-o-plane. 6 Mod in Perry v Kendricks ( 1956 ), the claim unconnected! Out an asbestos survey ) 2 App Cotesworth ( 1704 ) 6 Mod in v... ] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses ( Statute ) How do I carry out an survey. Exemption Clauses ( Statute ) How do I carry out an asbestos survey, 1890-1940 an asbestos survey jeb v! 2002 ] Env [ 1857 ] 7 EB 872 Kerensa Jennings Expand search and in flooded... Ponsonby [ 1857 ] 7 EB 872 Kerensa Jennings Expand search v Commonwealth Commission!

Recreational Property For Sale Alberta, Colleges That Closed In The 1990's, Mako Pro Skiff 17 75hp Top Speed, Timothy Runnels Today, Sissonville, Wv Obituaries, Articles H